The Beat-Herder Festival 2010 (Review)

20 07 2010

Curioser and Curioser….Take a trip down festival-land’s peculiar rabbit hole at The Beat-Herder, Lancashire

If you were to take a group of creative artists and music-lovers, feed them acid and ask them to brainstorm their ideas for the best festival on earth, then you might get somewhere close to imagining the wacky carnival of ‘Beats and Barminess’ that is The Beat-Herder festival.

Born five years ago out of Bradford’s underground party scene, The Beat-Herder is  funded by an independent group of friends and held in the beautiful rolling hills of the Ribble Valley, Lancashire. With no corporate ties or commercial interests, The Beat-herder sticks two fingers up to the big boys: this wacky jamboree hasn’t forgotten its roots.

Diverse, vibrant and exploding with creativity, the only goal is for everyone involved to have a good time- and for a small back to basics festival, there’s a million ways to do it. Meander around the eclectic array of stalls (including many fancy dress shops, ideal for Saturday’s annual competition), play chinese whispers around the firepit, take advantage of the ‘pimp your wellies’ service, or chill out smoking hookah pipes and enjoying the acts in the Smoky Tentacles Shisha Lounge. Take part in an African dance or art workshop, challenge your mates to a space-hopper race, crawl on your belly through ‘Granddad’s tunnel’, or try your luck on the bucking sheep rodeo.

You won’t have to queue for 45 minutes to buy crap beer at extortionate prices in the main arena: feel free to take your own drinks through security, buy some cold cans once inside, or get a traditional pint in The Beat-Herder and District Working Man’s Club (who wants beer tents when you can have a whole pub?) This authentic and reasonably priced watering hole had a 1940’s theme this year, with a great variety of acts, comedy and entertainment, including bingo, a pub quiz, and not forgetting the annual ‘Beat-Herder’s got Talent’ competition- judged by Corrie’s Janice Battersby.

The Beat-Herder crowd is arguably the most eclectic and colourful mix of people in festival-land, and the beauty of this knees-up is that everyone- without exception- throws themselves wholeheartedly into the festival spirit: there’s a whole lot of love going around and the party atmosphere is second to none. Unlike other festivals, the punters become part of the overall entertainment- a wander through the campsite means stopping off at friendly raves that rival those in the main arena, and in the campervan area you’re likely to find girls selling vodka jellies and other such party treats out of the back of a 1960’s ambulance.

At The Beat-Herder anything goes, and the wonders never cease. A highlight for me is John’s snug, a tent decked out like an old lady’s living room, complete with shabby sofas, bookcases and old paintings, with the DJ hidden behind what first appears to be a mirror. The main stage and the various tents dotted around the site offer something for everyone- folk, funk, reggae, psytrance, breaks, dubstep, techno, drum n’ bass- but when the sun sets orange and purple behind the breathtaking hills, there’s only one place to head for- the Toil Trees, a dreamy grotto of fairy lights, cool bars and banging tunes, where basslines wobble through the enchanted wood and the whole forest comes alive with magic.

Memorable acts this year included Erol Alkan, Dan Le Sac vs Scroobius Pip, Utah Saints and the hilarious Lancashire Hotpots, with a fantastic set from The Dub Pistols- ‘bringing down the forest’ for the final set of the weekend. Then there was Key-Lo and Sicknote, a little-known breaks act from nearby Todmorden making their festival debut. With the whole of Toil Trees bouncing and a reciprocal energy rarely seen (arguably one of the best crowd responses of the weekend) they really proved that you don’t need big names at festivals to have a belting time.

There were, however, a few disappointing acts: a rather poor performance from Prodigy cover act The Jilted Generation for example, which left many punters questioning why the real deal weren’t approached instead, and Laylo and Bushwacker’s set didn’t quite live up to the hype. Andy C’s set in the Stumblefunk tent, on the other hand, proved so popular that a one-in one-out policy had to be adopted, leaving many punters annoyed.

Perhaps the biggest drawback of The Beat-Herder is that there is a complete shut-down of the site at midnight on Sunday, when most people are just getting into the party spirit. In addition, 3500 extra tickets on sale this year meant cattle-market style security barriers that have been absent from previous years, and as a result of this (plus stricter searches and bigger queues) many Beat-Herder regulars complained that the festival was heading towards the slippery slope of commercialism.

But this remains to be seen, and for the moment The Beat-Herder retains its charm and sticks firmly to its underground roots. It still has style, soul and plenty of substance sorely lacking at the bigger festivals. The Beat-Herder is the Alice in Wonderland of summer events, a teddy bear’s picnic for grown-ups, a melting pot of insane theatre, mad shenanigans, wonderful nonsense and the best music you’ll find at any dance festival.

At five am, when a beautiful lake of mist gathered eerily in the valley beneath nearby Pendle Hill- famous for its legendary witches- I began to think The Beat-Herder must have soaked up some of this ancient cosmic energy for itself.





Northumberland and the Farne Islands: travel piece

17 07 2009

Northumberland and The Farne Islands: Idyllic, Historic, Spectacular

Just two miles off England’s stunning Northumbrian coastline, grey seals laze on rocky outcrops jutting from the rolling waves while puffins, kittiwakes, cormorants, razorbills and guillemots soar in the blue sky high above the water carrying fish for their young.

Here lie the iconic Farne Islands, the most easterly point on the Great Whin Sill, a rock formation that runs for some 70 to 80 miles across the northeast of England.

I boarded a boat from the quaint coastal town of Seahouses (which is home to Pinnacles, ‘the best chippy in the country’ according to TV’s The Hairy Bikers) to reach these North Sea islands, which number 16 at high tide and 28 at low tide.

Isolated, rustic and unchanged for thousands of years, the Farnes are protected by the National Trust and visitors are only permitted on two of the largest landmasses: Staple and Inner Farne.

As we near land, the call of thousands of seabirds is deafening and we are overwhelmed by the smell of bird droppings. ‘It’s ten times worse on a hot, wet day,’ the skipper chuckles.

But it’s a small price to pay for what awaits us: with the exception of a dozen National Trust wardens who live on the isles most of the year (coping with no electricity or running water), these windswept islands are uninhabited by humans. Instead, they are home to more than 80 thousand pairs of seabirds and a healthy population of adorable grey seals.

More than 274 different bird species visit the Farnes between April and September, gathering for the breeding season at one of Europe’s most important natural sanctuaries.

As the boat docks at Inner Farne we admire the endearing baby seals bobbing lazily in the sea with their mothers, and make our way up the path towards St Cuthbert’s Chapel and the information centre.

There, we are dive-bombed by arctic terns whose chicks are nesting on the ground. The birds chatter and squawk as we make our way past their low-level roosts, swooping low and pecking at heads. Fortunately their best efforts don’t hurt, but nevertheless we are given a handy tip: to carry sticks above our bodies, as the birds always attack the highest point.

Like the arctic terns, puffins living on the Farne Islands (the largest colony in England) also nest on the ground, but rather than using their beaks to ward off predators they make underground burrows for their young.

Visitors are able to look inside the homes of these charming birds, with their unmistakable orange beaks and comical walk, through a camera inserted into the dark hole. ‘I have to be careful where I’m putting my hand,’ the warden tells us as we gather around the viewer. ‘Puffins have three caverns in each den, and one is used only as a toilet!’

The Farne Islands are not just a haven for birdwatchers and wildlife enthusiasts; they are a fantastic day trip for anyone who simply wants to stop the clock and unwind in one of the most beautiful and picturesque corners of England.

‘Visiting the Farne Islands between May and late July is one of the best wildlife experiences you can have,’ says Sadie Parker, communications officer for the National Trust.

‘It’s also seal pupping time from late September through November, but if you’d like a quieter break, visit from September to April when the birds have left and you can relax, unwind and take in spectacular views. There’s plenty to see whatever time of year you come.’

But why stop at the Farnes? The far northeastern county of Northumberland boasts 17 miles of spectacular golden coastline, one of the most magnificent and best-kept secrets in Britain. The dramatic beaches, unspoilt by tourism, give way to breathtaking rolling green fields and heather-clad open moorland further inland.

There, you can explore the Northumberland National Park, the North Pennines, and England’s largest forest: Kielder Water and Forest Park, where 50% of England’s native endangered red squirrel population dwell.

For an active holiday, there are plenty of opportunities for mountain biking, rock climbing, horse riding, fishing, and water skiing. Keen walkers can take the majestic Northumberland coastal path, which is part of the striking North Sea trail: a 64-mile continuous route between Cresswell in the south and Berwick-upon-Tweed in the north.

Steeped in history, Northumberland also embodies England’s rich cultural past.

Firstly, there’s the world heritage site of Hadrian’s Wall, a remarkable fortification
where little has changed since building began in AD122: it’s easy to picture Roman centurions from all corners of the empire patrolling the 73-mile garrison, still intact in many parts.

Hadrian’s Wall is dotted with Iron Age and Roman forts, temples and archeological sites such as Vindolanda, Housesteads, Chesters and Corbridge, where re-enactments of battles take place most weekends in the summer months.

Then there’s Holy Island, cut off from the mainland at high tide and home to both the Tudor fort of Lindisfarne castle and the ancient Lindisfarne priory, one of the most important centres of early Christianity in Anglo-Saxon England. Lose yourself in panoramic views of the Northumbrian coast or explore the visitor centre, where visions of seventh-century monks fleeing fearsome Viking invaders are brought to life.

As if that wasn’t enough, Northumberland has more castles than any other English county, and is home to several monumental fortresses.

The superb keep of Warkworth sits astride a hilltop over the river Coquet and is arguably one of the most impressive and largest forts in Northern England. Warkworth resident of old, Henry ‘Hotspur’, son of the Earl of Northumberland, is famed for being brought to life by Shakespeare as the valiant and courageous character in his acclaimed play ‘Henry IV’.

Across the sea from the Farne Islands you can see the famed Victorian structure of Bamburgh castle, once home to ancient kings and partly destroyed in the Wars of the Roses. Long before that, Bamburgh was a prehistoric settlement. The magnificent building is now home to the Armstrong family and a popular TV and film location, where visitors can wander the public galleries and view ancient artifacts of armour, artwork and exquisite furniture.

The medieval Chillingham castle in the heart of the Cheviot Hills is famous for its beautiful gardens and spooky reputation. Dating back to the days of Braveheart hero William Wallace, the castle was home to the infamous Edward Longshanks, and was an important line of defence against invading Scots.

Featured on TV’s Most Haunted show, Chillingham has a bloody and violent history: ghostly prisoners are reported to walk the eerie passages to this day. A small dungeon has markings scratched into the mortar where captives kept count of their incarceration, and it is said that if you look down through the grate covering the castle’s oubliette you can see the remains of a young girl looking back. The torture chamber houses gruesome cages, barrels full of spikes, boiling pots, and terrifying implements once used to gouge out the eyes of Scottish rebels. Feeling brave? Ghost-hunters are welcome to test their stamina by staying in the castle overnight!

If you prefer something a little less disturbing, head back to the coast, where the awesome ruins of Dunstanburgh castle stand on an imposing headland reached only by a coastal path from nearby Craster. With some of the most spectacular sea views in the country, a visit to Dunstanburgh is the perfect way to de-stress.

Last, but not least, Northumberland boasts the superb Alnwick castle, dubbed as the ‘Windsor of the North’. Famous for its role as Hogwarts in the Harry Potter films, Alnwick is home to the Duke and Duchess of Northumberland and is one of the largest inhabited castles in England. In addition to memorabilia, private art collections and the palatial interior, there are many daily activities for visitors young and old alike: choose from archery and fighting skills, birds of prey handling or the slaying of fire-breathing dragons!

Getting there: The Farne Islands

Boats from Seahouses to the Farne Islands run daily from 10am (weather permitting) between 1st April and 31st October. From November to March, cruises are by special request only.

Choose from a number of tailored tours, with prices between £10-25 for adults and £7-15 for children. For more information on the types of cruises available, including private boat hire and scuba diving, visit www.farne-islands.com, or call Billy Shiels Boat Trips on (+0044) 01665 720308.

The landing fee for the Farne Islands must be paid separately to the National Trust.
See www.nationaltrust.org.uk/farneislands.

Between 1st May and 31st July: £5.80 adults, £2.90 children.
At all other times: £4.80 adults, £2.40 children.

Landing is free for children under five and National Trust members, and annual membership starts at just £35.63. To see the full range of membership options, go to www.nationaltrust.org.uk or call 0844 800 1895.

Accommodation and Attraction Information

Northumberland National Park, Kielder Water and Forest Park, Hadrian’s Wall, Housesteads, Holy Island and all the castles featured are owned by the National Trust.

Prices differ from place to place, but all attractions are free for children under five and National Trust members. Annual membership starts at just £35.63. To see the full range of membership options, go to www.nationaltrust.org.uk or call 0844 800 1895.

For details on Chillingham castle’s ghost tours, see www.chillinghamcastle.co.uk. Tours are by arrangement all year round, £20 per person.

Northumberland boasts a huge range of accommodation to suit everyone: hotels, cottages, B&Bs, farmhouses, and country inns are available at all times of year in beautiful surroundings. To browse accommodation or research the attractions featured in this article, go to www.visitnorthumberland.com, nationaltrust.org.uk/holidays, or www.visitnortheastengland.com.





Change-a-lujah people! Joining Rev Billy on his Shopocalypse Tour

9 07 2009

It’s a perfectly ordinary day in a Liverpool city centre branch of Tesco. Customers clutching lunchtime snacks queue patiently in silence. Bored-looking cashiers scan sandwiches and salads on autopilot, daydreaming of clocking off and enjoying the sunshine outside.

Suddenly, the store fills up with men and women wearing long green robes, making low humming noises as they weave in and out of the aisles. The humming grows louder, and the expressionless troupe begin to clap- softly at first, before raising the volume and tempo. One woman starts to sing in a beautiful and sorrowful voice: ‘Shopping in Tesco- it hurts the people, hurts the ’hood.’

Her associates join in the chorus and approach the tills, where the queue has become  significantly shorter as customers abandon their baskets and edge towards the exit. Two young cashiers exchange bemused glances and giggle nervously while their manager frantically calls security.

In bursts a Kurt Russell lookalike wearing a beige polyester suit and dog collar. His blonde hair is swept back into an enormous quiff and he’s carrying a megaphone. At first glance, he looks like any other Evangelical man of the cloth. But this is Reverend Billy, head of the Church of Life After Shopping, and he’s a man on a very different mission.

‘This new Tescos is like a spiritual slamming of the door!’ declares the Rev, his Southern drawl mirroring the style of the archetypal preacher. ‘We see the devil, expanding like a cancer, and as the economy collapses it takes advantage!’

Reverend Billy shimmies under the barrier and stands with his back to the tills, legs straddled wide and arms outstretched touching the cash registers. The employees back up against the cigarette display with increasingly fearful expressions as a whispering crowd gathers to watch the spectacle unfold.

‘Change-a-lujah people!’ the Rev cries, his pitch rising. ‘How do we defend ourselves against the demon monoculture? Rise up! Resist the corrupt men in suits sitting on fat clouds thinking about profits!’

Then, writhing around with shaking legs and rolling eyes, he ‘exorcises’ the cash registers (or, in Reverend Billy speak, ‘the genitals of the giant’). Once he has dispelled the evil from the tills, the Rev’s twitching body falls into the arms of his green-robed disciples who begin clapping and singing wildly, and we file out of the store as though nothing outlandish has taken place.

Reverend Billy is the alter ego of Bill Talen, a 59 year-old playwright, community leader, comic actor, poet, activist, author and performance artist.

Born in Michigan in 1950, Talen’s parents were strict Dutch Calvinists who threatened him with terrifying images of hell, to the point where Bill ‘was afraid to look down in case his pants caught on fire’. As a teen, Talen ran away from home regularly and spent his early adulthood hitch-hiking across America.

On his travels he became politicized, getting involved in the civil rights movement and protests against the Vietnam war, inspired by counter-culture figures such as Kurt Vonnegut, Spalding Gray and Lenny Bruce. He arrived in New York in 1994 to make it as an actor on Broadway.

‘But I was crushed to discover that theatre no longer exists there,’ he says. ‘I put my last 70 dollars down on a great seat at a Broadway opening night. The curtain rises and there, centre stage, in hat and tails, tonight’s celebrity host: Mickey Fucking Mouse.’

Sidney Lanier, cousin of Tennessee Williams, became Talen’s close friend and mentor during this time. He persuaded Bill to put his acting skills, religious upbringing and anger at what he calls ‘The Disneyfication of Times Square’ to good use.

‘Sidney thought I should cast myself as a preacher who begins comically then gets serious,’ Bill says. ‘I retorted that, as a recovering Dutch Calvinist, I didn’t even want to spoof a Christian. I treasured my trauma and would take it jealously into middle age. Sidney reminded me that Jesus wasn’t a Christian, he was a prophetic social commentator. Jesus had never preached in a church or synagogue either; it was hillsides, living rooms, bars, and the street.’

So taking Sidney’s advice, Bill reinvented himself as a ‘pastor for the post-religious’. He dyed his hair, bought a pulpit and began shouting through a cardboard megaphone, eventually leaving the sidewalk behind in favour of retail interventions in Starbucks, Gap and the Disney store.

‘I became more and more focused through time on resisting consumerism,’ Talen explains. ‘The only sin is consumption.’

In 2000, Bill met his wife, Savitri Durkee, in a theatre lift. Together they built the Church of Stop Shopping, taking on actors, activists, ‘preacher’s kids, recovering executives and Wall Street addicts’ as choir members or musicians for the ‘Buy Nothing Band’.

The church grew steadily under Savitri’s theatrical direction, with regular services blending gospel singing, performance art and religion into a melting pot of wacky sermons and inspirational activism.

A decade on, Reverend Billy’s movement has captured the zeitgeist. Regular US tours were followed by European shows, the release of CDs, and his first book, What should I do if Reverend Billy is in my store? the title of which is taken from a Starbucks HQ memo issued to all stores across America in the wake of Talen’s numerous ‘retail interventions’ against the corporate coffee giant. Reverend Billy is now banned from going within 250 yards of any Starbucks on the planet, although this hasn’t deterred him.

In 2007, Morgan Spurlock of Supersize Me fame produced Talen’s first feature-length movie, What would Jesus Buy? Released at Christmas, it appealed to consumers to stop shopping and consider the impact of their purchases on the children working in sweatshops, the environmental devastation caused by shipping and packaging, and the advertising industry that supports rampant consumerism.

‘There’s only one authentic preacher now,’ Bill drawls. ‘And that preacher is talking to us. It’s coming in the form of tornadoes and fire and tsunamis. The Earth says, pay attention to this. And we don’t know how to: that would demand radical change.’

Far from being accused of blasphemy, Christianity Today called Talen’s message ‘contagious and admirable.’ Did this reaction come as a shock?

‘Yes, we were very surprised,’ Bill says. ‘We have every gender and sexuality in our choir, and we live our lives in ways they would not. But even evangelicals can be radical enviromentalists, and resisting consumerism is like Jesus driving the moneychangers from the temple.’

I met Bill on the Liverpool leg of his 11-day UK ‘Shopocalypse’ Tour. Elusive, mysterious and impossible to pin down, Talen speaks very slowly, pausing often and searching for the right words. He has a habit of trailing off halfway through a point, flitting from one topic to another, and refusing to play ball with any information-gathering techniques I attempt to employ.

‘The first step in resisting consumerism is to elude the easy labeling of a Tesco shelf,’ Bill tells me softly when I ask why his church recently changed its name. ‘Artistic discretion is something not coded.’

Talen, or Reverend Billy (he struggles to decipher the distinction himself, saying ‘the lines are blurred, it’s beyond confusing’) is in the UK to support local traders, challenge Tesco, and forge links with grassroots activist groups. In the aftermath of the G20 summit and the expenses scandal, he has plenty to work with.

‘Those at the top, with their solid gold shower curtains, are addicted to shopping in exactly the same way as us at the bottom,’ Bill points out. ‘Politicians are being caught naked, like in the Emperor’s new clothes. Consumerism wages war and hypnotises us, like all fundamentalist religions.’

‘The stories and the narrative are so similar in every place,’ Talen says of the UK tour. ‘The Tesco’s and the Primark’s great monster shadows are over every town.’

In Bristol, a ‘retail intervention’ in Primark caused the Rev and his choir to be chased out of a shopping mall ‘by police officers who looked quite comic; had a bit of Charlie Chaplin about them’. In Grantham, he ‘exorcised Maggie Thatcher’s birthplace to rid it of any remaining demons.’

Reverend Billy begins his day in Liverpool drinking coffee and chatting to strangers in the lobby of the Bluecoat theatre, where anyone and everyone is welcome to join him for the day. After sitting in a circle and introducing ourselves, we are invited to
follow the troupe as the Rev heads out of the theatre lobby to ‘bless’ some local shops.

First we go to an independent shop selling glassware, gifts, jewellery and ornaments. As the green-robed choir sing about the wonder of the non-chain store, Reverend Billy asks the bemused trader, ‘sister Maureen’, to stand with him, while two middle aged ladies, smartly dressed and browsing the display cabinets, stop talking and bow their heads as if they really are in church, before scuttling out when nobody is looking.

Next it’s into Purlesque, a trendy boutique adorned with knitted items of all descriptions, polka dot and starred bunting, balls of wool in every colour, bags and gifts.

The choir provide some amazing backing vocals while the Rev improvises his sermon.
‘Oooh, aprons with hearts on them, children!’ He shouts. ‘Buttons, knitted martians; can I get a Local-ujah here?’ The choir obliges.

‘May the God of knitting defend us all,’ he goes on, his arms raised to the heavens, his head nodding furiously. ‘Give us the fortitude of the knitting Gods against the Tesco and the Primark!’

The choir clap and yell ‘Knit-a-lujah!’ as the laughing shop owner thanks Reverend Billy for his support, and we move on to Bob and Joan Porter’s, an independent jewellery and engraving shop.

‘Here’s Bob, surrounded by precious metals and crystal glass; he’s very much the high priest of his independent church here,’ raves the Rev, to whoops and claps from the choir. ‘May we all be this precise! Whoop! And this patient! Whoop!’

‘Amen!’ cry the choir in unison.

‘Bob gives us the artistry we need to defeat the monoculture devil! The reproduced invasion of Tescos!’ screeches Reverend Billy. ‘Local-ujah! Amen!’

Finally, we file into Drum, a fairtrade shop selling tribal percussion, masks, rugs, ornaments, and vases.

This time Reverend Billy’s sermon centres around Ethiopian Sidamo coffee beans, which Starbucks were previously selling for 26 dollars per pound. Only 78 cents were going to the farmers until Talen joined the campaign to get them a better deal. Starbucks eventually relented, and the farmers now get a measly, but improved, three dollars per pound of Sidamo beans sold.

After lunch Reverend Billy blesses a local bookshop before spotting a Tesco store across the street. He can’t help himself: despite his wife Savitri stating earlier that ‘yelling and police are off the table for today’, the Rev has other ideas, and his retail intervention goes ahead.

‘When the devil shows up and starts threatening your friends with its gnashing of teeth and threats of hellfire, you have to do your duty,’ he explains with a grin.

When we exit Tesco, security are waiting for us, but they don’t say a word as we file past. The troupe grows in numbers as passers-by join the parade, and as we cross the road to St Lukes Church, two police cars tear past and screech to a halt outside the Tesco store we just came from.

Reverend Billy’s tour manager is then approached and questioned by two officers on horseback, who seem unsure what charges to make (‘have you been singing in Tesco?’) and reluctantly, they leave us to seek refuge into the derelict church for a final sermon and choir performance before tonight’s show.

Savitri, warm and welcoming with a shock of messy dark curls, is understanding about the police presence everywhere they go.

‘People are attached to their brands; it resembles nationalism and it’s endemic,’ she says softly. ‘You can see it in both workers and customers. It means something to people to say, “I shop at Topshop” or “I drink Starbucks coffee.” It’s a lifestyle. But you can’t blame consumers; those are the tools we are given within this culture.’

She is, however, optimistic that things are changing in the wake of the economic crisis: ‘I feel we’re starting over. There’s a breaking up of forces, and cracks and seams you can move into.’

We chat about Bill’s New York mayoral campaign- he is running on the Green Party ticket. Although he faces stiff opposition, his localisation policies are simple and appealing.

Talen wants to empower local communities by giving them more opportunity to borrow money from credit unions, thus pushing out the big banks and make it more difficult for corporations to undercut local traders. He is campaigning for economic diversity, the defence of public space, sustainability, and safe, diverse, vibrant neighbourhoods.

I wonder whether voters are as confused as him about whether they are supporting a human parody or a politician who happens to have an alter ego. Talen brushes this concern aside. ‘We found a new way to connect; we campaigned all day on the subway and it was fascinating,’ he sidesteps.

‘It’s like another kind of law-making,’ Bill says, referring to people power. ‘It’s very exciting; it comes from neighbourhoods and the home-made, rough-hewn politics we explore in our choir: a hope and a faith and a new kind of value system. Looking across history, real change- such as ending slavery or overthrowing fascism- started in people’s homes, and they ended up gathering in plazas and marching. That is how we break from the past.’

To Talen, it’s pretty simple: corruption, the homogenisation of towns and cities, environmental devastation, economic globalisation, war, poverty- it all boils down to consumerism.

He claims that ‘Bombing Baghdad is shopping’: the invasion was sold to us through a sophisticated advertising campaign (Bill likens the worldwide protests to ‘focus groups’ which were ignored), the country is carved up for profit, and all the while we are told to carry on shopping if we want to save ourselves from terrorism and economic collapse.

‘Somehow, we’re involved in an economy that starts thousands of miles away, and all of it adds up to war,’ Talen says. ‘It starts in Afghanistan or God knows where else- and the over-packaged, over-shipped big box stores, personal debt, traffic jams and union-busting make those wars possible.’

I’m curious to know what Bill thinks of Obama: is he optimistic the president will keep his campaign promises?

‘I’m not waiting around,’ Talen replies wearily. ‘Rahm Emanuel (Obama’s Chief of Staff) served in the Israeli Army, and Larry Summers (Director of the National Economic Council) is a big liberal economist. I had my doubts as soon as Obama hired those two guys.’ He shrugs thoughtfully. ‘But he brought people out to vote, and social change is tended by the reclamation of public space.’

That night, at the Bluecoat theatre, the Reverend invites the congregation to throw away their credit cards and confess their consumer sins.

‘I see some sin in the back row!’ he screeches wildly. ‘Let me exorcise the evil into my pastoral flesh!’

Reverend Billy takes credit cards from the giggling congregation, and with trembling limbs and contorted face, he falls backwards and thrashes around as the choir soothe him by launching into an upbeat ditty called Blessed are You.

‘Forgiveness is the beginning of power,’ cries the Rev.
‘Forgive-a-lujah!’ comes the choir’s response.
‘Blessed are the kids working in the sweatshops,’ howls Bill, ‘and blessed are those of you who confuse consumerism for freedom! Can I get a Change-a-lujah here tonight!’

The show ends with a nod to Bill’s hero Martin Luther King, whose speeches made the basis for a song written for Elvis in 1968.

‘If I can dream of a better land, where all God’s children walk hand in hand, tell me why oh why can’t my dream come true?’ Talen recites sorrowfully.

He is dumbfounded as to how this song could have been used at the American Idol final in 2007: ‘I have a dream. How did that become instant fame and advertising?’ He rants. ‘You don’t see a social movement these days that hasn’t become a Starbucks coffee flavour.’

‘We have to break out of so much that makes us comfortable,’ Talen goes on. ‘Dr King said, at the moment I dream, my dream will have power. So they will be pushed back by our dreams, and we can reclaim our neighbourhoods. I’m no longer captain of this; the world is changing. If we can dream, our dream WILL come true. Amen!’

You can contact Reverend Billy or buy books, CDs and the DVD at www.revbilly.com.

Edited version to be published in Red Pepper, August 2009





The rise of social movements- technology or philanthropy?

3 04 2009

It’s 1am and there is a stranger asleep on my sofa, rucksack at his side, snoring gently.

Six hours earlier I’d been standing in the arrivals terminal at Manchester airport, self-consciously holding my homemade sign scrawled with the name ‘Ashley Drew’ and scanning the crowd for a face I’d only seen in a few blurred photographs.

Until now, Ashley and I hadn’t even spoken on the phone. All I knew from our brief and infrequent emails is that he’s 28 and from Melbourne, he likes animals and snooker, and the location of my sofa is rather appealing.

Ashley is a couchsurfer, one of over a million members worldwide. The idea is simple: rather than jostling for expensive hotel rooms with other tourists, the couchsurfing movement gives backpackers the opportunity to crash on sofas for free, with the added bonus of tasting real cultures and experiencing places other sightseers probably wouldn’t. As for the hosts, they receive the simple pleasure of helping somebody out.

Couchsurfing is just one example of the emerging social trends to sweep the globe in recent years.

With just a click of the mouse, we can train as ‘clown activists’, join a local food movement, swap houses with a family in Peru, or partake in some ‘flash mobbing’- whether it be a mass pillow fight in Trafalgar Square or heading down to a central London station to dance in synchronicity, an activity elevated from its subculture status by the popular mobile phone commercial.

Some, like ‘the slow movement’, are disgruntled reactions to perceived problems in society- in this case, what the founders call ‘time poverty’, a backlash against the rat race and living by the clock, against a society driven by instant gratification.

Others, like ‘bookcrossing’ (leave your favourite book somewhere public with a note inside and trace how much happiness it has given to the lucky recipient through the Internet) are simply a way of sharing with others those things that make you happy.

Then there are those simple but genius ideas that spread like wildfire, such as the ‘free hugs campaign’. This movement began when founder Juan Mann felt lonely upon his arrival at a Sydney airport and decided to hold up a sign offering free hugs to passers-by. After 15 minutes of being ignored, a lady tapped him on the shoulder and told Mann her dog had died that day- the first anniversary of her only daughter’s death in a car accident.

“What she needed now, when she felt most alone in the world, was a hug,” Mann remembers. “I got down on one knee, we put our arms around each other and when we parted, she was smiling.”

The free hugs campaign is now a global activity, with thousands of participants in hundreds of cities around the world.

No doubt cyberspace can be credited with the speedy growth of these movements, but is technology solely responsible for their conception, or is it merely the vehicle for ideas that are almost inevitable in the 21st century?

Professor Nick Crossley, head of sociology at the University of Manchester, believes the Internet is crucial to their existence.

“I’m sure these activities are attractive because they fill gaps in mainstream culture,” Crossley concedes. “But technologies facilitate networks, and I’d be reluctant to interpret these new cultural forms as social and political reactions.”

But some involved with these modern trends wouldn’t necessarily agree.

Mark Aguera is founder of SwapRepublic.com, an online swap shop for everything from skills (I teach you guitar, you do my gardening in return) to houses, cars and personal possessions.

Rather than seeing the Internet merely as a means of connecting with like-minded individuals, Mark says that SwapRepublic’s philosophy is “to eliminate cash from transactions, because cash means the state has power to tax.” His aim, he says, is to remove power from the state and give it to the individual.

For Reid Mihalko, former relationship coach and massage therapist, technology may well have caused the emergence of movements like these – but not for the right reasons.

“The Internet has both helped and hindered society,” Mihalko says. “We feel more connected by social networking sites and we can easily track down others who share our interests, but these connections never occur face to face.

“We are social animals, and physical connection feeds us in a way the Internet can’t. You might have 500 facebook friends, but you’re still going home to an empty apartment every night.”

Along with partner Marcia Baczynski , Mihalko launched the ‘cuddle party’ in 2003. At the events, strangers don their pyjamas and give and receive non-sexual affection through a variety of hugs with punchy titles such as the ‘canoodle casserole’ and ‘puppy pile-up’.

In the five years since the first New York event, the appeal of embracing a stranger has proved to be a desirable pastime, with cuddle parties springing up all over the western world.

Mihalko puts the movement’s popularity down to modern living: moving away from loved ones to pursue careers in cities where we feel alone, losing community ties, and coping with social boundaries that mean hugging a co-worker could get you sacked for sexual harassment. He even claims one infant school in Pennsylvania recently slapped a ban on pupils cuddling each other, citing this behaviour as ‘inappropriate’.

“We’re living in interesting times. Things are getting weird, and people are starting to notice,” Mihalko concludes.

Some might argue that collectively, these movements seem to signal a change in attitude, a step in the right direction towards a more humanitarian and philanthropic society.

Catherine Ryan Hyde is founder of the global ‘pay it forward’ movement. The philosophy, made famous by the 2000 Kevin Spacey/Helen Hunt film based on Ryan Hyde’s book, advocates the belief we can only make the world a better place by doing good deeds and asking for nothing in return – except that the person we help comes to the aid of another needy cause, thus ‘paying it forward.’

While Ryan Hyde agrees the Internet “has the power to tie people together; ideas can spread without the money and power needed to control the media,” she is confident these movements are far bigger than that.

“My opinion is that society tends to swing to the far boundaries of any
social change before finding the middle ground,” Ryan Hyde says.

“When I was a child, people rode buses together. Neighbours sat on their porches and talked to people walking by. If I had needed help while on my own, an adult would have helped me.

“I think the information age initially isolated us,” she goes on. “We have swung to the end of the pendulum of war, violence, dysfunction, suspicion, hate. We look at what we’ve accidentally created and know we don’t want it. Our altruism was never dead, it was only sleeping – and when more people wake up to the kindness that is inherent in our nature, it will be contagious.”

Her colleague Charley Johnson is just as optimistic, referring to pay it forward as “the foundation this world is missing.”

“Making the people around you better starts with yourself,” Johnson argues. “It’s the only thing that will move the six billion people on this earth back in the right direction.”

So, could these trends really represent a deep human urge to counteract the world’s many wrongs, or is this just idealistic nonsense?

“It’s true there’s been a sea-change in the nature and behaviour of social movements over the past 25 years or so,” Another professor of sociology at a leading British University (who would rather remain anonymous) admits. “But a quick visit to a few websites allows us to be more aware of the range that exist.

“Unfortunately, it is not at all clear whether or not the increase in social movements heralds a new egalitarianism, or a new politics based around an anti-capitalist ethos.”

But a spokesperson for the UK Freegans society, known only as JD, says that for him, freeganism is not about rooting through supermarket bins in a bid to save money, but rather a direct protest against an unjust market.

“We are becoming increasingly aware of the devastating impact mankind is having on the environment,” JD argues. “This has largely been caused by unsustainable policies designed to maximize the profits of the few at the expense of the many. Freeganism attempts to address the imbalance caused by this.”

Other ethical trends include freecycling, a worldwide movement of five million people in 85 countries. The idea is to keep unwanted goods out of landfill by offering them to your local community for free. There are over 500 community groups in the UK alone, with participants giving and receiving everything from furniture and clothes to cars, pets and travel tickets.

When I asked habitual ‘freecyclers’ their motives for giving away possessions they could quite easily sell, responses pointed to a growing environmental awareness, an underlying anti-consumerist feeling and, more surprisingly, an indifferent attitude to material wealth.

“We live in a throwaway society,” One lady explained after offering a three-piece suite, apparently in great condition, she would have otherwise taken to the tip.

“I feel like I’m doing my bit for the planet, and I can find most of the things I need on freecycle without paying over the odds. On top of that, I don’t need the money from selling my unwanted goods.”

Overall, though, basic generosity seemed the biggest incentive. “I just like the feeling of making someone happy,” one lady stated after giving away a campervan worth over £2000.

As author and social commentator Mal Fletcher states, “A number of these emerging social movements are about rediscovering a sense of our core humanity, both as individuals and within communities.

“In a consumerist society where personal value is associated with what one owns, and consumption is divorced from any sense of responsibility, many people are awakening to the notion that things which supposedly lead to a more comfortable life do not necessarily contribute to a more meaningful life.”

Links:

www.couchsurfing.com
www.slowmovement.com
www.freehugscampaign.org
www.flashmob.co.uk
www.cuddleparty.com
www.swaprepublic.com
www.payitforwardfoundation.org
www.freegan.org.uk
www.freecycle.org





Israeli aggressors should take their morals from personal history

5 01 2009

started writing an opinion piece on the Israel-Palestine situation, and whilst doing so was sent an email from a friend with a link to the article below. It sums up my feelings exactly but has the added weight of personal experience- Judith Stone says it better than I ever could and I hope that she will not mind me posting her work here. The article was sent by Judith Stone to Debbie Ducro, a American-Jewish journalist with the Kansas City Jewish Chronicle. She published it, and was fired the next day. The world has gone mad.

Quest for justice

By Judith Stone

I am a Jew. I was a participant in the Rally for the Right of Return to Palestine. It was the right thing to do.

I’ve heard about the European holocaust against the Jews since I was a small child. I’ve visited the memorials in Washington, DC and Jerusalem dedicated to Jewish lives lost and I’ve cried at the recognition to what level of atrocity mankind is capable of sinking.

Where are the Jews of conscience? No righteous malice can be held against the survivors of Hitler’s holocaust. These fragments of humanity were in no position to make choices beyond that of personal survival. We must not forget that being a survivor or a co-religionist of the victims of the European Holocaust does not grant dispensation from abiding by the rules of humanity.

“Never again” as a motto, rings hollow when it means “never again to us alone.” My generation was raised being led to believe that the biblical land was a vast desert inhabited by a handful of impoverished Palestinians living with their camels and eking out a living in the sand. The arrival of the Jews was touted as a tremendous benefit to these desert dwellers. Golda Meir even assured us that there “is no Palestinian problem”.

We know now this picture wasn’t as it was painted. Palestine was a land filled with people who called it home. There were thriving towns and villages, schools and hospitals. There were Jews, Christians and Muslims.

In fact, prior to the occupation, Jews represented a mere seven per cent of the population and owned three per cent of the land.

Taking the blinders off for a moment, I see a second atrocity perpetuated by the very people who should be exquisitely sensitive to the suffering of others. These people knew what it felt like to be ordered out of your home at gun point and forced to march into the night to unknown destinations or face execution on the spot. The people who displaced the Palestinians knew first hand what it means to watch your home in flames, to surrender everything dear to your heart at a moment’s notice. Bulldozers levelled hundreds of villages, along with the remains of the village inhabitants, the old and the young. This was nothing new to the world.

Poland is a vast graveyard of the Jews of Europe. Israel is the final resting place of the massacred Palestinian people. A short distance from the memorial to the Jewish children lost to the holocaust in Europe there is a levelled parking lot. Under this parking lot is what’s left of a once flourishing village and the bodies of men, women and children whose only crime was taking up needed space and not leaving graciously. This particular burial marker reads: “Public Parking”.

I’ve talked with Palestinians. I have yet to meet a Palestinian who hasn’t lost a member of their family to the Israeli Shoah, nor a Palestinian who cannot name a relative or friend languishing under inhumane conditions in an Israeli prison. Time and time again, Israel is cited for human rights violations to no avail. On a recent trip to Israel, I visited the refugee camps inhabited by a people who have waited 52 years in these ‘temporary’ camps to go home. Every Palestinian grandparent can tell you the name of their village, their street, and where the olive trees were planted. Their grandchildren may never have been home, but they can tell you where their great-grandfather lies buried and where the village well stood. The press has fostered the portrait of the Palestinian terrorist. But the victims who rose up against human indignity in the Warsaw Ghetto are called heroes. Those who lost their lives are called martyrs. The Palestinian who tosses a rock in desperation is a terrorist.

Two years ago I drove through Palestine and watched intricate sprinkler systems watering lush green lawns of Zionist settlers in their new condominium complexes, surrounded by armed guards and barbed wire in the midst of a Palestinian community where there was not adequate water to drink and the surrounding fields were sandy and dry. University professor Moshe Zimmerman reported in the Jerusalem Post (30 April, 1995), “The [Jewish] children of Hebron are just like Hitler’s youth.”

We Jews are suing for restitution, lost wages, compensation for homes, land, slave labour and back wages in Europe. Am I a traitor of a Jew for supporting the right of return of the Palestinian refugees to their birthplace and compensation for what was taken that cannot be returned?

The Jewish dead cannot be brought back to life and neither can the Palestinian massacred be resurrected. David Ben Gurion said, “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves…politically, we are the aggressors and they defend themselves…The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country…”.

Palestine is a land that has been occupied and emptied of its people. Its cultural and physical landmarks have been obliterated and replaced by tidy Hebrew signs. The history of a people was the first thing eradicated by the occupiers. The history of the indigenous people has been all but eradicated as though they never existed. And all this has been hailed by the world as a miraculous act of God. We must recognise that Israel’s existence is not even a question of legality so much as it is an illegal fait accompli realised through the use of force while supported by the Western powers. The UN missions directed at Israel in attempting to correct its violations of have thus far been futile.

In Hertzl’s ‘The Jewish State’ the father of Zionism said: “We must investigate and take possession of the new Jewish country by means of every modern expedient.” I guess I agree with Ehud Barak (3 June 1998) when he said, “If I were a Palestinian, I’d also join a terror group.” I’d go a step further perhaps. Rather than throwing little stones in desperation, I’d hurtle a boulder.

Hopefully, somewhere deep inside, every Jew of conscience knows that this was no war; that this was not G-d’s restitution of the holy land to it’s rightful owners. We know that a human atrocity was and continues to be perpetuated against an innocent people who couldn’t come up with the arms and money to defend themselves against the western powers bent upon their demise as a people.

We cannot continue to say, “But what were we to do?” Zionism is not synonymous with Judaism. I wholly support the rally of the right of return of the Palestinian people here.





Conscientious Objectors Stand Up

9 12 2008

In the wake of the deplorable Mumbai attacks, I have noticed a significant number of my Facebook acquaintances have rushed to join thousands of others in the website’s ‘support our troops’ cyber groups.

I have nothing against this flurry of action per se- I appreciate British and US troops are doing jobs I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy, I appreciate they are mostly good people, I have no ill-feeling towards them at all, and I genuinely hope they return home safe and well.

But I can’t bring myself to support them. By doing so, I feel I would also be sanctioning our disastrous, bloody and illegal campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan.

When I was a child, my mother used to buy me a poppy every Remembrance Day. I don’t remember the first time I ever wore one, but I do recall the first time the custom was explained to me when I was around five years old.

I remember feeling a sense of awe and respect for these heroic men; men who fought totalitarianism, men who fought for freedom, for liberty, for democracy, for human rights, men who fought for future generations, for me, men who fought bravely against a very real and tangible fascist enemy.

There was no question about it in my childish mind: Allies equalled goodies, Germans equalled baddies. I felt pride. God bless those poor brave boys, many of whom were barely adults, forced into trenches, forced on to the front line as cannon fodder, forced across No Man’s land, many against their will, while England was blitzed by the Luftwaffe.

I decided there and then, I would wear a poppy every November for the rest of my life.

And I did, until 2001, when we attacked Afghanistan. That year, I bought my poppy as usual, but with a faint sense of unease. It felt hypocritical to wear something in support of our soldiers when I opposed the invasion so strongly, and I found myself strangely self-conscious with the red flower on my jacket, as though it no longer represented the same things it had the previous year.

On Remembrance Day 2003, after we’d been carpet-bombing Iraq for 7 months, I couldn’t bring myself to pin a poppy on my lapel at all. I thought of the Allied forces defeating the Germans in 1918 and 1945 and I asked myself: Where is the fascist regime we are fighting this time? Who exactly is the enemy? Where is the real threat to my freedom and my country’s democracy?

The tabloids screamed we were at War. Muslims were avoided in the streets. Bush declared people were either with the US, or against them. Debates sprang up, people’s vocabularies shifted. ‘Extremist’, ‘fundamentalist’ and ‘terrorist’ jumped out of every newspaper, every letters page, every politician’s speech. This sinister and orchestrated creation of a legitimate division, of ‘us and them’, of an invisible enemy, fooled us, and continues to fool us.

A genius plan, straight from the pages of Orwell’s 1984: How can war ever cease when the enemy is everywhere and yet, paradoxically, nowhere? How can a people be truly free in a state of perpetual war? How can human rights, constitutions, and fundamental liberties be upheld in the face of the intangible Terrorist bogeyman?

To date, between 100, 000 and 655, 000 Iraqi civilians are dead (despicably but not surprisingly, nobody keeps any figures) and 4300 coalition soldiers have lost their lives in combat. There is an increase in Islamic extremism worldwide as a direct response to coalition aggression, Bin Laden has never been found, the Taliban remain strong, the situation in Iraq is hellish and shows no signs of stabilizing, and every day, hundreds of babies are born with severe disfigurements from coalition forces’ illegal and barbaric use of depleted uranium.

Yes, we are the fascist enemy. We, the coalition of the dodgy dossiers and bare-faced lies, the ‘democratic’ coalition which ignored millions of protestors worldwide, the coalition of illegal pre-emptive strikes, of war crimes, of bare-faced lies, of spin on an unprecendented scale, the coalition making billions of pounds per year from stolen oil fields and lucrative contracts to rebuild the ravaged countries it has raped and murdered for seven long years.

When we occasionally stir from our deep slumber long enough to question these monstrous and undeniable realities, we are hushed by popular culture, lulled back to sleep by reality TV, distracted by celebrity gossip and the ubiquitous quest for fame, money and the perfect body.

As tabloid headlines scream Peter and Jordan’s marriage is on the rocks, plans are drawn up for false flag attacks to facilitate invasions of Iran or Pakistan. While the Pussycat Dolls sing about their boobies and bank balances, Iraq is carved up and another innocent man shackled, beaten and starved in Guantanamo Bay.

But never mind, here’s some more bullshit to hypnotise the masses: how about cooing over the X Factor contestants as they turn Mariah Carey’s Hero into propaganda for the cause?  That’ll take their minds off the unspeakable atrocities we’re committing in the name of Operation Spread Freedom and Democracy. Ha, suckers.

We are hypnotized by tycoons like Murdoch, a chillingly clever man, a Joseph Goebbels of his time, a man who uses his newspapers and TV stations to tell us our only hope is to back the coalition, to support our troops, to be patriotic. Demonising Islam, spreading lies, launching smear campaigns, inciting hatred, instilling fear.

How dare we spend last month’s Remembrance Day thinking of the Jews of Nazi Germany? We ARE the German people who stood by and watched!

How dare we pray that Auschwitz never happen again when we allow Guantanamo to exist? How dare we ask how those ordinary people allowed the mass murder of innocent civilians when we do the same today? How dare we get upset by the past when it is repeating itself under our noses?

How dare we assume we are more moral and civilised than the German people, when we have lost our right to be considered innocent until proven guilty and hardly noticed, when Muslims worldwide are dehumanized just as the Jews were?

How dare we berate their support of a fascist regime, when we have already lost the majority of our human rights, when the database state is here, when all around us is the rapid and terrifying emergence of Big Brother and plans for a world government answerable to nobody?

How dare we, when we now have trials without a jury and indefinite periods of house arrest, when we have a justice system being quietly eroded under our snoring noses, when we have inhumane periods of detention without charge, when we have the systematic use of coalition torture and extradition treaties to the US for any European citizen it likes, without question or protection at home?

Wake up!

Don’t waste your time lobbying to support the troops. Instead, support liberty, support equality, support peace. Support bringing the troops home.





You have the right to remain silent……..

13 11 2008

When Jacqueline Maitland was arrested at a peaceful protest against ID cards this year, it was at the behest of the Home Office. Bundled into a police car and locked in a cell, her fingerprints were taken, along with a DNA sample she was given no explanation for. Her associate Charlie was not allowed to use the telephone to arrange for her children to be picked up from school, and despite police telling Jacqueline she and her colleagues were ‘obviously not dangerous’, her four-year old son was separated from her for the full six hours’ detainment period.

Welcome to modern Britain, where the fundamental freedoms set out in the 1950 European Convention of Human Rights have been steadily and systematically dismantled since New Labour came to power: freedom from torture, freedom of speech and expression, freedom to assemble, freedom to a fair trial, and freedom to privacy. Then there’s Habeas Corpus, the idea of being innocent until proven guilty: a legal civil liberty since 1679, nullified in the blink of an eye by the 2005 Prevention of Terrorism Act.

Home secretary Jacqui Smith announced this month that people “can’t wait” for the estimated £5bn ID card and National Identity Register scheme, but also admitted in one speech the proposal “should make us question closely those who manage personal information on our behalf.”

As Geraint Bevan, arrested along with Jacqueline Maitland at the NO2ID protest, points out, “We saw that the government can’t be trusted when the child benefit database was lost: so even if you trust their motives, you have to question their competence.”

We’re told the risk of fraud and identity theft will be greatly reduced, but the database, holding every detail imaginable, including fingerprints, photographs and family data, would be a hacker’s goldmine. Cardholders could also be rendered a non-person at the click of a mouse: and would be vulnerable to prejudice, discrimination and even blackmail.

Even if you do trust local and national government with your most private data, could you say the same if another party came to power several years down the line? We have no idea whose hands this data might fall into, or for what purposes it will be used. In Rwanda, mass genocide was only possible because Hutus and Tutsis carried ID cards. Mohammed Siddique Khan left an ID card at the scene of the London bombings, as did the Madrid and 9/11 bombers, and in today’s Britain, forced DNA sampling is on the way not only for convicted criminals, but for all offences- even minor traffic stops.

As Charlie Morgan-Walton of NO2ID bluntly states, “we’re moving away from a representative government to one which wants to own your right to exist.”

So do we really have to lose our fundamental freedoms in order to be safe? Are we all potential criminals in this brave new world? Is there really no way that security and liberty can be reconciled?

I set out to investigate just a couple of case studies from the endless list relating to the rapid erosion of our rights- not only privacy, but to those of free expression, speech, and assembly, and what I found was deeply disturbing for anyone who cares about the values of freedom and democracy in this nation.

Jacqueline, Geraint and Charlie of NO2ID were charged with breach of the peace along with five others in June this year after dressing up and handing out leaflets outside an Edinburgh hotel where MP Meg Hillier was chairing a ‘public’ consultation on ID cards.

“I had just finished giving my son Tiger his lunch and was doing a TV interview,” Jacqueline remembers. “We saw the police arrive, sirens blaring, and rush inside. I was expecting that we’d just be moved on, but we were never given that option.”

“It was all very friendly and happy at first,” Geraint, co-ordinator of the Glasgow branch, told me. “We chatted to tourists and staff from the hotel and children were waving at us.”

After an hour, Geraint had gone into the meeting, and at question time had asked why the planned National Identity Register (an all-inclusive Orwellian database) hadn’t been mentioned, and why the public had been excluded. “It was very secretive, and attended by stakeholders, police and councillors to gather ideas for the deployment of ID cards,” Geraint says.

Upon asking his questions, the microphone was taken from Geraint and he was escorted out by senior civil servants. “I stopped at the door and urged everyone to read our leaflet,” Geraint explains.  At that point Geraint was restrained before being pushed out of the room into a waiting TV camera. Geraint gave an interview and got ready to leave. However, before he could do so the police arrived, and were “surprisingly aggressive.”

Despite Geraint being the only member to have attended the ‘public’ meeting, nine members of NO2ID (including a 17 year-old on his first protest and a pensioner) were arrested outside, charged and released on bail. The charges were dropped just 24 hours before the court case.

“We were shell-shocked by the response,” NO2ID’s Charlie Morgan-Walton says. Jacqueline, meanwhile, says she was too upset to question the police. “I just wanted my boy,” she admits. “The day after he was very subdued and difficult to handle.”

“All of this greatly undermines democracy,” Geraint argues. “Our right to protest is absolutely fundamental to a healthy society.”

Other case studies show it’s not just our own government we need to be wary of. There are 35 US military bases in Britain, all of which are excluded from both Pentagon and MOD reports. Operating outside British law, the US military has been accused of spying on protesters who question their foreign policy and the presence of American bases on our soil.

Reverend Chris Howson, vicar of a Bradford church and member of Yorkshire Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, recently found himself the subject of US military surveillance after inviting his congregation to a peaceful demonstration at Menwith Hill near Otley in West Yorkshire- the largest electronic monitoring station outside the US itself.

“After I sent the email, the office was called by Joe McKenzie, an intelligence officer at the base,” Rev Howson explains. “He wanted to know how many people would be coming to the protest. I was taken aback, and when I asked Mr McKenzie how he knew, I was told it was ‘open source material’. I then sent a second email to my congregation, concerned we were being monitored. Immediately after, I received a call from Mr McKenzie, and he openly admitted that yes, we were under surveillance.”

“This was a legitimate, legal protest,” Rev Howson argues. “Police resources should be targeted towards real crime and terrorism, rather than those campaigning on peace and environmental issues.”

In fact, section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 has been routinely used to stop citizens from exercising their right to free expression and assembly. It gives police the right to stop and search people and vehicles and severely curtails our freedom of expression. But perhaps the most controversial piece of recent legislation is the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, which makes all offences arrestable.

Despite its alarmist title (suggesting the tackling of criminal gangs, paedophile rings and human trafficking), SOCPA is more frequently used to silence campaigners, including prohibition on any protest within one square kilometre of Parliament square- unless permission has been granted by the Metropolitan Police six days prior to the protest.

Several jaw-dropping examples of SOCPA’s uses are documented by the self-styled ‘Blackbook Activists’, a collective opposing the law. These include, amongst many others: the case of Sian Murphy, who was threatened with arrest in 2006 for carrying a cake with the word ‘peace’ iced on to it; the arrest of Neil Goodwin in 2007 for dressing up as Charlie Chaplin; the arrest of Steve Jago in 2006 for possessing three copies of Vanity Fair ‘containing politically motivated material’, and the most publicised of all: the case of Maya Evans, who was arrested by two police sergeants and 12 constables for standing outside the Cenotaph with associate Milan Rai in 2005 and reading out the names of soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

So what are the ramifications of these case studies and the many others like them?

Blair once famously said, “The rules of the game are changing. Civil liberties arguments are…made for another age”, while Gordon Brown has reflected his predecessor’s position with the doublespeak rhetoric: “How we protect people’s liberty has to change to meet new security needs.”

Reading between the lines, what exactly does this mean in practice? It means SOCPA, the Terrorism Act and others will continue to be used against peaceful protesters, and the staggering 3000 criminal offences created in just ten years by New Labour could be joined by many more. It means plans to introduce airport facial recognition, fingerprint testing and iris scanners, and in addition, proposals to collect 19 pieces of information (including mobile phone and credit card details) from all British people travelling abroad. It means increasing our DNA database- already bigger than any dictatorship’s, with millions of innocent citizens and children on it –and the introduction of ID cards making you vulnerable to hackers, incompetent civil servants and discrimination. It means the continued practice of conducting trials without a jury- a fundamental right since the Magna Carta was signed in 1215, abolished overnight by Blunkett’s Criminal Justice Act- or worse, the terrifying trend of keeping people under house arrest for an indefinite length of time even after they have been found innocent in a court of law. It means plans to deploy ‘black boxes’ in ISPs’ networking hubs so that the government can record every website we visit, and a planned database of every email we send and phone call we make. It means an increase in CCTV surveillance (although there is already one camera for every 14 citizens, with the average person caught on camera 300 times per day). It means continued extradition of British citizens to the US under a secretive 2003 treaty, with no legal protection at home; it means police harassment and 266 state powers allowing them to force their way into your home. It means plans for trackers in every car in Britain, and the planned surveillance of potential ‘future criminals’ (ie, children). It means councils and 600 other public bodies snooping through your rubbish bins, intercepting your post and bugging phones and emails at will; it means being spied on by government bodies like NETCU, who label peaceful campaigners as ‘domestic extremists’, it means facing jail terms for speaking up on issues that matter to you. It means a total blanket ban on peaceful assembly at all MOD sites, nuclear power stations, and 16 parliamentary, royal and governmental sites. It means Orwell’s 1984, that great literary warning, is here.

“The nightmare future we are hurtling towards will give us nothing less than electronic slavery that would change forever the relationship between the citizen and the state,” says John Welford, Edinburgh co-ordinator for No2ID. “It is crucial that we all dig our heels in and shout enough is enough. In a very short space of time we will face the frightening prospect of the state knowing much more about each of us than we know about ourselves, and such a willful destruction of people’s privacy is unheard of in any democracy on earth. Whatever people sacrificed their lives for in the last two World Wars, it certainly wasn’t this.”

Note to end:
It’s worth pointing out that Meg Hillier MP and various Home Office staff were given ample time to respond to all the issues raised in this article, but none were forthcoming. However, upon explaining the nature of my feature, frantic questions were asked concerning the publication and print date and all my details were taken immediately.

To be published in The Big Issue in the North, 29 December 2008





Science vs Spirituality: the bigger picture

17 10 2008

Richard Dawkins, scientist and outspoken atheist, thinks we should start a revolution. Purge the world of organised religion, fight back against political correctness and the loss of our freedom to speak up against fundamentalist ideas, embrace Darwinism and realise the truth of the matter: that for centuries, religion has been used as a means of controlling the masses, subjugating women, imparting propaganda and causing divisions between humans. The Bible and other religious books are tools of the rich, powerful and corrupt men who have shaped our world with their ideals and laws since the middle ages. Let me state from the outset, I couldn’t agree more with those points.

However, by declaring science and spirituality as exact opposites, Dawkins is missing the bigger picture.

We have always made clear and distinct dichotomies in our society: light and dark, good and evil, day and night, summer and winter. This separation of what should be a flowing process from one to the other is a fundamental reason why we fail to grasp the interconnectedness of every living thing, and why we therefore lack compassion, fight wars and disrespect our planet in the most arrogant way imaginable.

We need to radically alter our worldview. Ancient civilizations knew, as the remaining shamanic societies know still, that without day, there would be no concept of night. Without bad people, there would be no-one considered good. Without chaos, there would be no order arising from the ashes. Chinese philosophy talks about yin and yang, while Hinduism pays reverence to the Goddess Kali, both the creator and the destroyer. Our pre-occupation in the West with pigeon-holing, labeling, cutting concepts up, complicating them, separating and dissecting their meanings, has caused us to assume there are only two options when it comes to belief in a divine power: you’re either religious, or you’re not.

Suppose this is a grossly distorted and simplistic view of the issue. Suppose we got it wrong centuries ago when our religious books were written, and until then ‘God’ was simply a word describing the life force of the universe. The word ‘God’ became a name, corrupted for hegemonic reasons by the institutions seeking control, a name of a super-being that demanded respect and fear, a name that controlled societies with images of heaven and hell, a name that rapidly lost all its original meaning.

But if we take away the connotations, strip away the labels and the images of an all-seeing, all-knowing, wrathful man in the clouds, if we give the word ‘God’ a new identity- its original identity- what are we left with?

Nature itself. Evolution, natural selection, the beginning and the end of life, the Big Bang, the workings of a woman’s womb during pregnancy, the instincts of a bee or a homing pigeon, the survival of the fittest, the laws of attraction and gravity, love itself. God is not a being but a force for good and bad, yin and yang, the creator and the destroyer. God is the name of the elements, the rivers and trees and hills and mountains, the reason that camels have humps and giraffes long necks.

What if ‘God’ as a divine designer and the theory of evolution are not dichotomies to be pitted against eachother, they are one and the same? Atheists like Dawkins have done an impressive job of making this point seem ridiculous, laughable even. But ask yourself what a ‘divine force’ would mean in reality of our experience, and you will think of nature in all its positive and negative glory.

That’s not to say God isn’t real, only that He is not a he. It’s not to say we cannot feel this force, speak to it, gain direction from it, have our questions answered or wishes granted. I believe we can do all these things whilst still rejecting both God’s traditional image and the holy books written by humans who possess no more of a relationship with the universe than the people who take those words quite literally. I, like many other pantheists (and nontheists), am uncomfortable with the term God, and, if forced to label, prefer to call this life force by the ancient, purer, Meso-American term ‘Xibalba’, or the even simpler ‘Being’.

At their most basic levels, science and spirituality have the same goals, both rooted in ancient philosophy. They aim to answer the questions we have been asking since the beginning of human history. Where did we come from? Where are we going? What is the meaning of life? The fight between these two ideas, ongoing since the beginning of modern civilization, is rather like the frustration of watching two politicians arguing the same case from differing perspectives, all the while trying to rubbish their opponent’s argument.

The fact of the matter is there are overlapping areas- great, fundamental overlapping areas- where both science and spirituality seem to be in agreement (although very rarely in public), and numerous examples can be found that tie the two inextricably together.

Take Quantum mechanics, a branch of physics so bizarre and mind-boggling that its findings are often less easy to believe than the stories of Noah’s Ark, Christ’s resurrection or Original sin: those of alternate, infinite realities, parallel universes, time travel, and the proof that atoms pop in and out of existence- meaning that everyday items such as your coffee table or sofa only become real by the act of observation. It’s insane, but because we can measure and observe it, it is scientific, therefore it goes largely unquestioned in a Western society which (ironically) uses logic as the cornerstone of philosophy.

Indeed, if science is increasingly proving that the universe does not play by the rules we’ve always assumed, then logic is increasingly shown to be irrelevant. The results we are seeing in quantum mechanics now are as important and life-changing as those which disproved the Earth is flat, or that the sun revolves around our planet. We have to remember that seemingly ridiculous and controversial concepts in one era become hard facts in the next: Newton, Einstein, Copernicus and Darwin are all testament to revolutionary ideas with the power to cause paradigm shifts in human consciousness and an awareness of our place within the universe, and there will inevitably be more added to the list this century.

Take, for example, the case of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, whose experiment on the power of thought led him to bottle distilled water from the same source and label each bottle with various different words: ‘love’, ‘hate’, ‘peace’, etc. It is beyond comprehension, but a fact nonetheless, that during this study, the water molecules seen through a dark field microscope responded to the labels and changed their pattern accordingly.

Thoughts are waves; they move, they touch other people and they influence non-sentient things, Doctor Emoto’s research concluded. Decades ago, we would have scoffed at ‘mind power’. Today, hypnosis is a respected way of dealing with a whole host of issues, and we all accept that whether or not an athlete believes he will win a race could determine whether he does. Consider these mainstream ways of thought projection: is there really a difference between these modern, scientific philosophies and traditional prayer, popular ‘cosmic ordering’, or even spell-casting?

Another study to consider is the work of scientist Duncan MacDougall, whose 1907 research aimed to prove the existence of spirit. He found that after death, the body weighs approximately 21 grams less than it did in life. So what is it that has just left the body? Why is science so averse to the idea we might have a soul that lives on past this mortal machine we inhabit?

It’s certainly possible: quantum physicists admit that they have gone into every orifice of our bodies and cannot find ‘the observer.’ Our eyes do not see; they are simply a lens that sends messages back to the brain. Our visual cortex does not see, and the brain does not see. So who sees? What is consciousness and where does it reside?

Scientists have also found that the brain does not know the difference between what it sees and what it remembers- and that dreams can only be experienced in relation to references we already have stored in our brains. This is a crucial point. It means that whether in waking or sleeping life, we are unable to decode  (visualise) anything that we have not encountered previously. What this teaches us is that our understanding and knowledge of the world around us is always constrained by our five senses and brain capability.

Look at it this way- it’s a well-known fact that we only use a small percentage of our brains. But when you take that information and consider it alongside this- that the brain receives over 400 billion pieces of information a second and processes only 2000 of those- you have to wonder what potentially wonderful revelations we are missing out on.

All of these scientific findings seem to conclude that there are a lot of weird and magical happenings in this universe, and indeed inside our own brains, that cannot (and will not) be explained in terms of traditional logic, something which is becoming increasingly redundant as quantum mechanics makes giant leaps. After all, if physicists have learned one thing, it is that anything is possible: the more we learn, the more clueless we become about the workings of the universe. (and if alternate realities are scientifically possible, then who are we to say those realities cannot be accessed by humans in the form of alien abduction, mediums communicating with the dead, or through mystical experiences such as angel or spirit visitations?)

So ask yourself: are you so arrogant to think that you know all there is to know by dismissing anything vaguely outside your own understanding? Even when your own understanding is limited entirely by what your brain can scientifically take in?

Perhaps we should come to terms with the fact that none of us know anything: as Socrates said, ‘wisest is he who knows he does not know.’

Is it possible that in being forced to choose between a divine supreme being or a nothingness that we inevitably go to the extremes of these two ideas? Why can they not be reconciled? Is it possible that an aversion to the word ‘God’ because of its religious overtones could in itself cause a person to never experience the real truth of the word? Is it possible that atheists are as blinkered and narrow minded as those full of religious fervour?

Subscribing to Darwinism does not, in itself, disprove the existence of something divine. You cannot argue there is no higher power simply by proclaiming ‘we have no proof.’ When atheists use arguments like this, it reinforces the outdated and harmful dichotomy once more. It reinforces the ‘battle’ between evolution as a scientific process and God as a fictional character. What if neither is true? What if both are true? What happens if we disregard traditional debate and think outside the box?

‘God’ is a word that should be used sparingly (or preferably not at all) because it is corrupted and misused by both ‘sides’. What if ‘God’ is not a reference to that man watching over me and you, God is me and you; what if the word refers to the life that flows through us all? God is every animal, plant and mineral. God is a word hijacked by power-hungry men and used to separate humans from eachother, to cause division and therefore continued need for control and protection under the church. When you believe God is a supreme being, you aim only to please Him. You are encouraged to consider yourself separate from other humans, from the Earth itself. You are encouraged only to seek his approval, which in turn is the approval of his human representatives in the religious institutions.

The hijacking of the word ‘God’ from a force we can all see and feel towards a divine being to be feared and worshipped is ultimately a hijacking of the knowledge the ancients had, the knowledge many shamanic societies still own. Knowledge which if adopted, could ultimately change the world.

We are all made from the atoms of stars, we are connected, we affect eachother and the world around us, we are One, we are bound by invisible energy fields, waves of thought, and other natural laws we may never truly understand.

If we choose to believe this, we have the choice between using our collective consciousness for charity, love and compassion rather than destruction, greed and war. What kind of world do you want to live in?

Let’s start by scrapping the dichotomies between science and spirituality, atheism and religion. Perhaps the dismantling of  these divisive terms will then filter down into everything we think and do, our actions towards our fellow humans and the beautiful planet which hosts us.





The Christian hijacking of paganism

17 10 2008

Reading the letters page of Metro newspaper the other day, one correspondence caught my attention. It was a ridiculous fire-and-brimstone ramble from a Roman Catholic, who branded Halloween ‘wicked’ and ‘evil’, shrieking it’s a travesty anyone celebrates it at all when what we should really be doing is sitting at home blessing ourselves with holy water and muttering hail marys into our rosary beads, blah blah.

Isn’t it ironic that the ‘evil’ and ‘wickedness’ surrounding the tradition stems from lies peddled by the Church in the middle ages to encourage people to fear paganism and succumb to the control and domination of Christian teachings?

Halloween’s original name is Samhain, (pronounced Sow-en). This was, for Celts at the time (ie, everyone living in Britain and also those pagans in Northern and Western Europe), the New Year; the end of Summer and beginning of Winter. Its meaning was simple; it was a period of reflection and saying goodbye to what had been and gone. Traditionally, this included deceased family members, as it was thought on Samhain the veil between the earthly and astral planes was at its thinnest. Pagans (a name which has negative connotations but which actually translates from the Latin for ‘country-dweller) used to set the table for their ancestors and used carved-out pumpkins or turnips with candles inside to guide the dead back home.

Granted, this sounds a bit strange and eerie to us modern-day westerners, but it was perfectly normal before the spread of Catholicism (which sadly, succeeded in its aim to control the masses and subjugate women, who up until this point were revered by men as part of the life-giving, feminine force of nature).

At this time (from 700 BC), Rome was becoming the dominant power in Europe. In 317AD, Emperor Constantine declared Christianity to be the official religion of the Roman Empire, so as its conquering armies pushed north, peace-loving druids were encouraged to embrace Catholicism and turn their backs on traditional ways of living. Two hundred years later, Pope Gregory I thought of a more cunning plan to spread Catholicism and eradicate traditional beliefs. He recognised that that people were unwilling to change their ways and would continue to worship at the ancient sites their ancestors had. So he decreed that all churches should be built on existing pagan temples. Later still, Pope Innocent VIII published a witch-hunter’s manual, and inquisitors subsequently burnt thousands of people, mainly women, at the stake on suspicion of practising rites that had been passed down from generation to generation. With some timely and cleverly applied propaganda, coupled with the tactic of controlling the general public through fear of witchcraft, the Catholic Church managed to destroy the true meaning of the peaceful ways that had gone before.

The Church changed the date of All Saints Day (which was previously in May) to November 1, which is the day following Samhain. Samhain then became known as All Hallow’s Eve, or Halloween, in order to appease the pagan-oriented congregation. Halloween traditions such as Trick or treating have their origins in Samhain, but probably more surprising is that this time of year was also an auspicious time for new love (being as it was the new year), and in ancient times, apples were considered a symbol of love and fertility. The Norse ate them for youth and what we call bobbing for apples was originally called ‘snapping for apples”. If a man got an apple then it mean the woman he loved loved him back.

So you see, Halloween is not about the mad rush to Woolies for a cute witches’ outfit for little Courtney, and nor do its traditional roots mean what it has been claimed by the Church over the last hundred years. While I’m on this topic I could also get on my high horse about the Christian hijacking of other Celtic festivals such as Yule, with its logs, carols, fir trees, holly, copious amounts of alcohol and stolen kisses under the mistletoe (obviously re-named Christmas and said to be about the birth of Jesus) Beltane (May Day) and Easter, or Eostre (an Anglo-Saxon Goddess thought to bring Spring- nothing to do with the ressurection but rather a convenient way of slipping in some Christian propaganda into an already-established pantheist festival).

All of these dates, without exception, were used as a cunning way of intertwining Bible stories into the everyday lives of people who had until then worshipped nature alone, and in doing so giving these traditional rituals bad connotations. More importantly, in the 21st century, it allows greedy, soulless companies to make millions of pounds by encouraging us to buy pumpkins, sweets, costumes and other such novelty bullshit without really understanding what it all means.

I say we boycott this year’s festivities and instead celebrate the Autumn equinox- Happy New Year everyone!





Banksy’s unveiling and what it says about our class system

15 07 2008

Newsflash: Banksy is, dare I say it, middle class. Yes, he’s been outed in the most shocking manner; the Mail on Sunday spent a whole year tracking him down and putting together the most exclusive exclusive in the history of journalism.

I love Banksy’s work, for the record. I find it beautiful, honest, inspiring, intelligent and moving. His paintings encompass my political beliefs, my frustration at certain global and societal issues, my hopes for the future. They are sometimes poignant, sometimes amusing, always brilliant.

So the question is, why the hell does it matter what his background is? Like anyone else who admires his work, I have often questioned who hides behind the veiled anonymity he has kept secret for so long. But the answer would never change my opinion of the artist or his work.

Why the shock horror that this enigmatic genius turns out to have been educated alongside the likes of Sophie Anderton, has middle management parents and lives in a leafy suburb? If Banksy is middle class, does it degrade his art in some way? Do we feel cheated?

I have read several forum posts which smugly point out that in the wake of the revelation, we have proof he is a hypocrite; criticizing capitalism and then raking in millions ‘when he doesn’t even need the money.’ Equally as ridiculous are claims that ‘it was obvious he was middle class’, simply because (I read between the lines), working class people are incapable of painting with such intelligence. What a load of crap.

The whole story seems to say more about the class system in this country than anything else: graffiti is a low art form and therefore belongs to the scum of our society; someone with Banksy’s education should be using canvases rather than streets and making appearances on the South Bank Show.

What we should take away from the Mail on Sunday’s exclusive is that we need to radically alter our opinions of what graffiti is (an art form like any other), and more importantly, stop assuming that those who practise street art are council estate hoodie-wearing, glue-sniffing yobs.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.